|
Hum… maybe
I missed an openEJB concerns then. Can you
tell me why the following doesn’t work for you? OpenEJBInstanceFactoryAndCallBack
icb = new OpenEJBInstanceFactoryAndCallBack
icb( … ); JDO jdo =
new JDO(); jdo.setInstanceFactory(
icb ); jdo.setCallbackInterceptor(
icb ); I think it
works exactly the same except it allows both call back and instance to be in
the same class, or to be two. Let me
know, I am sure we can find some solution. Thomas -----Original Message----- >From: Alan Cabrera
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:40
PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [castor-dev] [JDO]
InstanceFactory checkin > >Hey Tom, I saw that my code for an InstanceFactory was
checked in. Thanks! > >There's one teeny problem. You added another set
method, setInstanceFactory(), instead of using setCallback() to the
TransactionContext class. I think it would be a problem for OpenEJB and
maybe others who wish to provide an InstanceFactory. Doing it my previous
way, you only had to set the call back at the JDO level once, which is
awfully convenient. Doing it the new way, I have to dig up the transaction
context and set it with my InstanceFactory every time. > >At first glance, I think that it will take a ton of code
changes in OpenEJB to use the new way, whereas it was a few line changes
before. I think that others will have the same difficulty in using the
new paradigm also. > > >Regards, >Alan > |
- [castor-dev] [JDO] InstanceFactory checkin Alan Cabrera
- Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] InstanceFactory checkin Thomas Yip
- Re: [castor-dev] [JDO] InstanceFactory checkin Alan Cabrera
