I noticed that a new "handler" attribute is available for field mapping of
existing classes. I think this is a great idea, but unfortunately, this
causes problems with JDO. The JDO classes expect a FieldHandlerImpl, not a
FieldHandler. The following fix will allow the use of user defined handlers
with JDO mappings.
-Steve
$ cvs diff -u src/main/org/exolab/castor/mapping/loader/MappingLoader.java
Index: src/main/org/exolab/castor/mapping/loader/MappingLoader.java
===================================================================
RCS file:
/cvs/castor/castor/src/main/org/exolab/castor/mapping/loader/MappingLoader.java,v
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -r1.74 MappingLoader.java
--- src/main/org/exolab/castor/mapping/loader/MappingLoader.java 6 Dec
2001 01:10:07 -0000 1.74
+++ src/main/org/exolab/castor/mapping/loader/MappingLoader.java 29
Jan 2002 19:31:36 -0000
@@ -634,7 +634,8 @@
FieldDescriptorImpl fieldDesc =
new FieldDescriptorImpl( fieldName,
typeInfo,
- userDefinedHandler,
+ new FieldHandlerImpl (
+ userDefinedHandler, typeInfo),
fieldMap.getTransient() );
fieldDesc.setRequired(fieldMap.getRequired());
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
