> > But inheritance capabilities in Castor would also mean that we can store inheritance >paths > into several tables or just in one (which is not normalized, but faster). > I think that Castor does support that, right ?
I personally used only a two-table approach, but a single table approach might likely work. > My point is that Castor is known not to support polymorphysm, but is that still true > (we made an evaluation of Castor some months ago and it still appears to be like > that in the documentation) ? Is the documentation outdated on that point ? > I not, what exactly is Castor's limitation in that area ? I don't get your point here - you first say you know it supports inheritance - and then you question it again? Or do you mean "multiple inheritence= by polymorphy? If so, thats more a java issue I believe. Maybe I have to update my OO dictionary.... Diez ______________________________________________________________________________ Die sch�nsten Ski-Regionen der Alpen - jetzt bei Ferienklick.de http://ferienklick.de/ski/?PP=2-5-100-105-38 ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
