-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 09:32:46 +0200

Before I respond, please note that some of us (me) don't use email
readers that html base.  

> <FONT face="Default Sans Serif, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica,
> sans-serif" size=2><P>Ned Wolpert
> wrote:</P><P>&lt;snip&gt;<BR>&gt;The real issue is that looking for
> performance gains is a constant.<BR>We can always try to make things
> faster.  We have to decide what is<BR>acceptable performance for a
> given release.  (I'm currently getting<BR>acceptable performance
> myself, so I may not be one to judge... though<BR>once lazy
> collections are less-likely to deadlock in a
> multi-threaded<BR>environment for me, then I'll have even better
> performance.)</P>


><P>O(N) = N where N = number of child objects. is ok IMO</P><P>O(N) = 
>N(1)*N(2)*...*N(n) is where&nbsp;N(n) = number of objects for a&nbsp;nth child class. 
>Is NOT ok IMO.</P><P>Regards</P><P>Jan H. Hansen<BR></P></FONT>

I didn't say it was great or enough.  I said I'm not one to judge
right now on performance requirements.  For me, reducing dead-lock is
simply more important right now... IMNSHO. :-)

- -- 

Virtually, 
Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

D08C2F45:  28E7 56CB 58AC C622 5A51  3C42 8B2B 2739 D08C 2F45 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Public key at http://www.keyserver.net

iD8DBQE80rT3iysnOdCML0URAu1UAJ96NHp3tX4UizG/1ug8YT8nirzMGACfVQxb
kEUOO+/6QwOfXBJlbFvh7rk=
=76I2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-dev

Reply via email to