I am trying to convince my boss that we should use Castor instead of
implementing persistence by hand. He's concerned that, since Castor is in
a pre-1.0 release, that it is not yet proven in heavy-usage environments;
he worries that, once deployed, we will start seeing performance problems
and unexpected bugs (which would be easier to fix in our code, he argues,
since we'd know our code better than Castor's).
Does anyone out there have any useful insight on this? Do you know about
Castor being used in any sites that have heavy loads?
Thanks,
Jessica
---
"Users complain that they receive too much spam, while spammers protest
messages are legal." -InfoWorld
"You do not have to do everything disagreeable that you have a right to
do." -Judith Martin (Miss Manners)
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
