This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Thanks for the info on OJB, as for Castor JDO - I stand corrected :)
>
>BTW, what aspects of JDO do you think make it more tailored to OODBMS? A few
>years ago I used Ardent's Java Relational Binding. It was a nice
>implementation of the ODMG spec and supported Object-Relational mapping.
>Ardent also produced an OODBMS called O2 and sister product called CRB (for
>C++). The whole point of the ODMG (v3) spec was that it was designed to hide
>whether an RDBMS or OODBMS was used for persistence. I don't see any major
>differences between that and JDO in terms of interfaces.
Andy,
It's been about a year since I actually studied the Sun JDO spec, so
it may be different now. I seem to remember thinking as I read through
it that it had an OODBMS flavor to it. It certainly leaned toward the
ODMG spec.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
