hi All,
I have Query regarding "Castor XML Mapping"
We have to Mapped XML to Java Objects using Castor.
Can my Mapping XML file Element bind to different Java Class
For Example "Mapping.XML"
----------------------------------------------------------------
<mapping>
<description>A mapping file for XYZ application</description>
<class name="claim.ClaimAggregate">
<field name="ClaimsOwnerAggregate"
type="claim.ClaimsOwnerAggregate">
<bind-xml name="ClaimHeaderAggregate" node="element" />
</field>
<field name="ClaimsAdminAggregate" type="claim.ClaimsAdminAggregate"
collection="array">
<bind-xml name="ClaimsAdminAggregate" node="element" />
</field>
</class>
</mapping>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks & Regards,
Sunil Chauhan
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Delnoij [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Castor vs. Oracle Business Components for Java
Dear Adam.
I understand your argument, and agree that Barracuda would provide for a
more clean implementation of MVC.
For now I am only interested in discussing Castor, as Struts is predefined.
Can you tell me how Castor compares to JDO and to Oracle Business
Components? How well does it implement the JDO specification?
Kind regards
Thomas Delnoij
Internet Engineer
IMN - SSE Baarn
Mobile: +31 6 144 300 14
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Adam Chesney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: woensdag 18 september 2002 16:32
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Castor vs. Oracle Business Components for Java
>
>
>I apologise for going slightly OT but:
>
>If you are starting a new project and are thinking about diving
>into Struts,
>you might like to consider using Barracuda instead
>(http://barracuda.enhydra.org), especially if the project is likely to
>increase in size in the future. Barracuda's MVC approach significantly
>reduces the maintenance nightmare associated with JSP technologies like
>Struts. Check out this page for a comparison:
>
>http://barracuda.enhydra.org/cvs_source/Barracuda/docs/barracuda_vs
>_struts.h
>tml
>
>Just my two pence,
>
>Adam.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bruce Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:19 PM
>Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Castor vs. Oracle Business Components for Java
>
>
>> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Delnoij said:
>>
>> TD>I am currently designing a web application that will be deployed on an
>> TD>Oracle 9iAS application server.
>> TD>
>> TD>I would like to know if anybody has any experience using Castor with
>Oracle
>> TD>9iAS and how Oracle Business Components for Java and Castor compare.
>> TD>
>> TD>The application we are building is not overly complex (some
>25 tables),
>> TD>which is the reason I doubt using the Oracle Componenets is a good
>idea. I
>> TD>have the impression using Castor with Jakarta Struts for
>instance would
>> TD>provide for an elegant solution.
>>
>> Thomas,
>>
>> I've designed apps using Castor and Struts. Although I'm not a
>huge fan of
>> Struts, I believe the combination is very good. Just my $0.02.
>>
>> Bruce
>> --
>> perl -e 'print
>unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
>> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
