<blatant-selfpromotion> And don't forget the O2XMapper tool which lets you map your legacy classes to xml, and provides validation for each mapping. Actually, I know of some teams which prefer this route because of simplicity of Mapping files. </blatant-selfpromotion> Shelly -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Daan.Hoogland@;nc3a.nato.int] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 6:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [castor-dev] The future of development of applications
Two cent: I think that, starting the development of an application, using xml data, you start by making example xml instances at first. So the XMLInstance2Schema is not just useful when you get a schema, but actually a help at designing one. Not that I talk of experience, I followed this path by hand-coding the schema in the end, so far at all occasions. I will certainly go about it as descibed the next time. > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Visco [mailto:kvisco@;intalio.com] > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 7:14 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [castor-dev] The future of development of applications > > > > To add to the design discussion, there may be times that you > run across > XML data, but no schema and you have to handle operations on > this data. > Instead of manually creating the schema, Castor can > automatically create > an XML Schema given an XML document. The schema could then be > edited or > used as-is for the basis of your data model. > > For example, given the following data: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <people> > <person> > <name>John Smith</name> > <age>22</age> > <birth-date>1980-10-11</birth-date> > <address> > <street>1900 South Norfolk St.</street> > <city>San Mateo</city> > <state>CA</state> > </address> > </person> > <person> > <name>Jennifer Jones</name> > <age>27</age> > <e-mail>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</e-mail> > </person> > </people> > > Castor 0.9.4 will generate the following schema: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";> > <xsd:element name="people"> > <xsd:complexType> > <xsd:sequence> > <xsd:element name="person" maxOccurs="unbounded"> > <xsd:complexType> > <xsd:sequence> > <xsd:element name="name" > type="xsd:string"/> > <xsd:element name="age" > type="xsd:integer"/> > <xsd:element name="birth-date" > minOccurs="0" > type="xsd:date"/> > <xsd:element name="address" minOccurs="0"> > <xsd:complexType> > <xsd:sequence> > <xsd:element name="street" > type="xsd:string"/> > <xsd:element name="city" > type="xsd:string"/> > <xsd:element name="state" > type="xsd:string"/> > </xsd:sequence> > </xsd:complexType> > </xsd:element> > <xsd:element name="e-mail" minOccurs="0" > type="xsd:string"/> > </xsd:sequence> > </xsd:complexType> > </xsd:element> > </xsd:sequence> > </xsd:complexType> > </xsd:element> > </xsd:schema> > > > Notice that it merges the two <person> elements into one > definition and > marks any elements that do not appear in both as optional. > > To try this out on your own data, use: > > java org.exolab.castor.xml.schema.util.XMLInstance2Schema input.xml > output.xsd > > --Keith > > Sergej Maslyukov wrote: > > > > Daniel, thank you for your answer. > > > > Serg > > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In my opinion the first path is most developmental > > > and elastic. > > > > > > In my apps the basic model (XSD) is created in XML > > > SPY. > > > Next i'm generating object model in Castor Source > > > Gen. > > > > > > My application using unmarshalling and marshalling > > > to operate on large XML > > > Documents. > > > > > > XSD used for object model generation is specially designed (is > > > mostly based on Types Definition and inheritance) so that causes > > > that my object model is > > > very flexible because methods and services for each > > > objects are separated > > > from objects that holds only values. > > > > > > (relation MyObject_methods -> (inherits) -> > > > MyObject_attributes_with > > > getters_and_setters) > > > > > > That causes my application is easy to maintenance. > > > All changes are made only on XSD level. On example > > > i'm adding some > > > attributes to xsd, regenerating model with Source Generator and > > > writing some service methods operating on new attributes (service > > > object are separeted > > > from object that folds values so i'm overwriting > > > only value objects). > > > > > > Next i'm using JDO to hold my XML data in DB. > > > > > > I think that solutions based on XSD model as a main maintenance > > > and project design document and separating functionality > > > (methods and services) from > > > objects is quite good solution for fast and > > > flexible developing. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sergej Maslyukov [mailto:serg_main@;yahoo.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:43 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [castor-dev] The future of development of applications > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > I would like to find out your opinion on the future > > > of > > > development of applications. Now there are some > > > technologies permitting to reduce time of designing > > > of > > > the applications storing the information in > > > databases > > > - w3c schema, castor SourceGenerator, doclet, JDO > > > and > > > others. My question consists in SLEDU]EM, what path > > > is > > > preferable: > > > > > > - to start development from the schema (XMLspy?), on > > > the basis of the schema to create a java classes > > > (castor sourcegenerator) and tables (castor jdo, > > > doclet) in the database > > > > > > - to create tables in the database (case tools - > > > ERwin, Oracle designer?) to generate on their basis > > > the schema (XMLspy) and a java classes (castor > > > sourcegenerator?) > > > - or there is other path? > > > > > > > > > Serg Maslyukov > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > > > http://faith.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send > > > mail to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send > > > mail to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More > > http://faith.yahoo.com > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
