This one time, at band camp, Parizher, Vadim said:
PV>Not sure I got the relevant answer. I experimented and if I specify
PV>"to-one" relationship, the query is exactly the type of join I would expect.
PV>However when I specify "to-many" relationship, the "to-many" object is
PV>filled using an outer join even though all the joining fields are specified
PV>as "required". That would impact performance. Thanks,
Vadim,
I just replied to a message thread (subject is 'Problem with
absolute/size on QueryResults') whose answer is similar to the one
I'm going to provide for your question.
One long term goal of the Castor Project is to remove the use any
JOIN syntax for loading dependent objects. This issue has certainly
been discussed in the past and it's something we'd like to do
eventually. However, right now we're (Mickael and I) simply trying
to reduce the number of bugs.
I'm not trying to avoid changing this functionality, it's really
just a matter of time (unfortunately working on Castor is not my
full-time job >:-().
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","<0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
