How does castor handle multiple databases, e.g. multiple jndi sources for a
single application? Can I have more than one database.xml? or can I specifiy
multiple databases in a single database.xml?
____________________________
Mark E. Cornelius
Phi Beta Sigma/Prince Hall Mason
The Woodlands, Texas

I had fainted, unless I had believed to see the goodness of the LORD
in the land of  the living.  Wait on the LORD:  be of good courage, and he
shall strengthen thine
heart: wait, I say, on the LORD. "

   Psalms 27:13-14

----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Visco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] XML Schema code generation and bound properties


>
> Hi David,
>
> Sounds like a bug to me, I'll try to get that patched up in the CVS
> ASAP. You may wish to file a bug via our buzilla for tracking purposes
> (http://bugzilla.exolab.org)
>
> Thanks,
>
> --Keith
>
> David Green wrote:
> >
> > Using the source generator from XML Schema, I've noticed that some bound
properties (notably the ones with the _has_foo) are generated as follows:
> >
> >     public void setContent(boolean content)
> >     {
> >         java.lang.Object oldContent = new Boolean(this._content);
> >         this._content = content;
> >         notifyPropertyChangeListeners("_content", oldContent, new
Boolean(this._content));
> >         this._has_content = true;
> >     } //-- void setContent(boolean)
> >
> > The property change listeners are fired before the _has_content is set,
thus causing problems when attempting to marshal the class from a property
change listener.  Shouldn't the set method look like this:
> >
> >     public void setContent(boolean content)
> >     {
> >         java.lang.Object oldContent = new Boolean(this._content);
> >         this._content = content;
> >         this._has_content = true;
> >         notifyPropertyChangeListeners("_content", oldContent, new
Boolean(this._content));
> >     } //-- void setContent(boolean)
> >
> > If there's a good reason for the existing code generation, please let me
know.  Otherwise, can someone commit a fix for this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> >         unsubscribe castor-dev
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-dev

Reply via email to