[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Thank you for the prompt responses on the list. I was able to take a very > complicate Schema which uses imports and several complex data types and > enumerations and cut my import/export/syntactic validation coding to zero. > I normally use JDOM for the job, but with this latest release of Castor I > am a believer; the task would have taken weeks with a straight XML coding > strategy .
That would make a great quote! :-) > > When I first wrapped my hands around Castor it didn't have the level of > configurability that it does now. I especially love the element vs type > class generation (I find the later to be more compact and readable). It improves all the time, especially with the contributions of the user base. The type/element approach has been out for some time though, since Oct 2000 actually, contributed by Andrew Fawcett. Unless the two sentences don't go hand-in-hand it's been a while since you've decided to come back to Castor. > So has anyone used anything that works equally well on the C++ side of things? The only XML data binding framework for C++ that I am aware of is XML Object Link from Rogue Wave software: http://www.roguewave.com/products/xol/ It's not free though. --Keith ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
