Part 2 of my article comparing XML data binding frameworks for Java is
now online at
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-databdopt2/ This part
covers performance issues (Part 1 covers usage and features). Castor has
some weaknesses in this area, but hopefully these can be addressed as it
moves toward a 1.0 release.
I've also got some initial code and documentation available online for
my JiBX XML data binding project at http://www.jibx.org This is taking
an approach very similar to Castor's mapped binding from the user
standpoint, although implemented very differently in order to get high
performance. Most of the techniques I'm using probably won't port easily
to the Castor framework (part of the reason why I'm not trying to use
Castor as a basis). At least it can suggest some areas for improvement,
anyway.
- Dennis
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
- Re: [castor-dev] XML data binding performance(performance ... Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: [castor-dev] XML data binding performance(perform... Dean Hiller
- Re: [castor-dev] XML data binding performance(per... Dennis Sosnoski
