Bruce, Mickael,
I have prepared a bugfix for bug 1045 and wanted to send it to the mailing list.
According to the size (154kB) your mailer refused
that. Should I split the mail or send it direct to one of you?
Below you find the text of my original mail:
Ralf
>Bruce, Mickael,
>
>could one of you check this patch for bug 1045 and process it into CVS. For you to
>understand the patch I think I should explain it
>a little.
>
>I started changing sql.type from NMTOKENS to CDATA in o.e.c.mapping.mapping.dtd and
>sql.type from XSD:NMTOKENS to XSD:string in
>o.e.c.mapping.mapping.xsd. Then I generated the package o.e.c.mapping.xml out of the
>xsd. Reviewing the generated classes I
>recognized:
>
>- some changes had been applied to the old xml packaged that had not been changed in
>the xsd (e.g. read-only).
>
>- according to changes on sourceGen some classes got different names especially the
>classes generated for xsd:simpleType. As far as
>I know this can not be fixed with the binding file at the moment so I had to change
>every call to this classes.
>
>- for the xsd:choice inside the class element a new class had been generated
>(ClassChoice.java). I did not try to fix this with
>binding.
>
>After all the changes I successfully run the testcases.
>
>While bilding the CVS diff I recognized that Keith Visco had applied another patch to
>o.e.c.tools.MappingTool.java and
>o.e.c.mapping.loader.MappingLoader.java. You have to take care not to break his patch.
>
>Ralf
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
