Hi, yes I use the LogInterceptor for log4j. Or more exactly I've set it up, but I've never seen a single line of log comming from it. From what I've seen in the source code of Castor, it seems normal because I didn't see any attempt to log something.
Marc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexey A. Efimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:04 PM Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Log messages from Castor > Hello, > Did you setup LogInterceptor? > > "How it" > http://www.brainopolis.com/castorwiki/Wiki.jsp?page=IntegratingLogging > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Guillemot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [castor-dev] Log messages from Castor > > > Hi, > > I think that Castor doesn't use log messages enough intensively as it > should to inform about it's work. For instance I just have to go with > the debugger to find why an object wasn't loaded. With this way I've > found the cause of the problem and could fix it, but it could havebeen > really easier for instance if Castor logs some information on discarded > exceptions (in my case ObjectNotFoundException in > org.exolab.castor.jdo.engine.OQLQueryImpl). > > Second question: why doesn't Castor use the great log4j or common > logging from Apache instead of it's own poor featured log classes? > > Marc. > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
