Hi Ulf, I agree, no specified type should be implicitly handled as "anyType". So, yes this sounds like a bug to me.
--Keith Ulf Heyder wrote: > > Hello again, > > regarding the example in my original message ... > > <xsd:schema ... elementFormDefault="qualified"> > ... > <xsd:element name="Foobar" type="foo:FoobarType"/> > <xsd:complexType name="FoobarType"> > <xsd:sequence> > <xsd:element name="Name" type="xsd:string"/> > <xsd:element name="Value" minOccurs="0"/> > </xsd:sequence> > </xsd:complexType> > ... > </xsd:schema> > > ... I tested how source generator handles the element "Value" without > explicit type (should be implicitly handled as "anyType") and with type="anyType". > > When I excplicitely write down the type="anyType" source generator creates a > java field with type java.lang.Object. Without writing down the > type="anyType" it references to a class "my.package.Value" wich it doesn't generate. > > Shall I send this as a bug to Bugzille? > > Thanks, Ulf > > -- > NEU F�R ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - f�r Fotos, Musik, Dateien... > Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gru�, GMX FotoService > > Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net > > +++ GMX - die erste Adresse f�r Mail, Message, More! +++ > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
