Thanks Keith,
Using binding file is a way to go.
regards,
-----sgu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -----To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: sgu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 02/25/2004 01:31PM
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] [re]Need a word from you guys about manipulating names of nested elements in schema
hnmmmmm... so I am the chosen one :)). Thanks anyways.
SourceGenarator still does not generate correct object
type even though I used anonymous complexType
definition. I will give a shot to this by using
binding
file you mentioned.
regards,
--- Keith Visco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> sgu wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Keith, etc:
> >
> > I don't know why I cannot get any response after I
> > repeatedly post the same question on this forum.I
> have
> > searched through archives and docs, and found
> nothing
> > related to this.
>
> I can shed some light on this...
>
> We all held a meeting the other day, and we choose
> by random the people
> that we refuse to answer questions from.
> Unfortunately your name was
> choosen...but since it appears that you're on to us,
> I guess I can make
> an exception and try to answer you mail. I just hope
> the others don't
> see me doing this or I could be excluded from
> choosing the next round
> names for people to annoy! :-)
>
> >
> > I am evaluating xmlbeans and castor, Castor can do
> > what xmlbeans cannot do, for example: generate
> default
> > constructors for java objects, implement equals,
> > cleaner getters/setters, etc. We need these nice
> > things in order to integrate with Hibernate. The
> only
> > thing I need to know now is: how to generate
> component
> > objects for nested elements while manipulating
> their
> > names. If Castor can do this, we may go ahead
> > integrate Castor with Huibernate. I am wondering
> if
> > castor-xml can do this.
> >
> > so, please give me a word on this so that I can
> choose
> > which path to go. Thanks.
> >
>
> Castor has a source generation binding file which
> will let you custom
> the names of the fields...
>
> > I have 2 schema files info.xsd and message.xsd, if
> I
> > use include as following:
> >
> > info.xsd:
> >
> > ......
> > <xs:element name="info">
> > <xs:complexType>
> > <xs:all>
> > <xs:element name="createdBy"
> type="xs:string"/>
> > </xs:all>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> > ......
> >
> > message.xsd:
> > <xs:include schemaLocation="info.xsd"
> > namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"/>
> >
> > <xs:element name="message">
> > <xs:complexType>
> > <xs:all>
> > <xs:element name="id" type="xs:string"/>
> > <xs:element ref="info" minOccurs="1"
> maxOccurs="1"
> > />
> > </xs:all>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
> > I get the correct results:
> > Info getInfo();
>
>
> OK...so far so good....
>
>
> >
> > But if I want to have something like this:
> > Info getInfomation();
> >
> > Here information should be of type Info in Message
> > class, I modified message.xsd:
> >
> > <xs:element name="message">
> > <xs:complexType>
> > <xs:all>
> > <xs:element name="id" type="xs:string"/>
> > <xs:element name="infomation"
> > type="info" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="1" />
> > </xs:all>
> > </xs:complexType>
> > </xs:element>
> >
> > then I still get:
> >
> > Object getInformation();
> >
>
>
> Right...because type "info" doesn't exist. At least
> not in the schema
> fragment you gave. Actually, I'm surprised no error
> message is given
> about that.
>
> You can refer to an element using element ref, but
> you cannot ref to an
> anonymous complexType definition.
>
> If you have a complexType such as:
>
> <complexType name="info">
> <xs:all>
> <xs:element name="createdBy"
> type="xs:string"/>
> </xs:all>
> ...
> </complexType>
>
> Then it would work...because type="info" would then
> refer to this type.
>
> > It seems that using ref can generate correct
> > getter/setter for containing objects, but it does
> let
> > me to specify property names. Is there any way
> around?
>
> When using element ref, no you can't change the name
> of the element,
> it's purely a reference to an existing declaration.
>
> Castor will let you change the name of the
> getter/setter methods however
> in the binding file.
>
> For an example binding file take a look at the
> src/examples/SourceGenerator directory, it contains
> a bindingInvoice.xml
> file which should be a good enough example to get
> you started with that.
>
> And please...don't tell anyone I responded to your
> e-mail...it could
> ruin my reputation! ;-)
>
> I hope that helps,
>
> --Keith
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
>
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send
> mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
