On 8 Jul 2004, at 21:15, Werner Guttmann wrote:
yes it would (in theory, at least .. ). Unfortunately, this would have a reverse performance effect as Castor right now does not distinguish between a
performance cache and a store for objects loaded as part of a long transaction. Unless such a clean separation is introduced, it will be nearly impossible to
introduce any improvements here.

So long as the FS cache itself included a tunable in-memory cache, it would perform the same role; objects accessed within the last n seconds or the last m objects held in memory, with LT objects persisted off disk. :)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-dev

Reply via email to