Heh, that was my thought. Its not always a good thing when a problem
just disappears. (although i dont usually complain when they do)
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:49:52 +0200, Werner Guttmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> NIck,
>
> thanks for coming back to us with your findings. Now, based on what you said, I
> don't know whether I should be happy or not .. ;-).
>
> Werner
>
>
>
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:52:25 -0400, Nick Stuart wrote:
>
> >
> >Hmph...well I suppose this is a good thing, but it appears the problem
> >has gone away. Go figure! :)
> >
> >Tried generating a test case of the circumstances, and nothing. So I
> >figured I'd give it a shot with my program and looky there....no
> >errors. Oh well....guess that'll learn me when reporting errors, dont
> >slack or the problem might just go away!!
> >
> >
> >On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:29:28 +0200, Werner Guttmann
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:01:35 -0400, Nick Stuart wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Here is the code where the Stack trace is from. As you can see,
> >> >nothing special going on:
> >> >/*
> >> > * ClientDataManager.java
> >> > *
> >> > * Created on September 10, 2004, 9:32 AM
> >> > */
> >> >
> >> >package com.vort.utils;
> >> >
> >> >import com.vort.beans.Client;
> >> >import org.exolab.castor.jdo.Database;
> >> >import org.exolab.castor.jdo.JDO;
> >> >import org.exolab.castor.jdo.PersistenceException;
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >/**
> >> > *
> >> > * @author nstuart
> >> > */
> >> >public class ClientDataManager extends DataManager {
> >> > ....
> >> > public void delete(Object object) throws PersistenceException {
> >> > Client client = (Client)object;
> >> > Database db = null;
> >> > client.getUser().removeClients(client);
> >> > try{
> >> > db = jdo.getDatabase();
> >> > db.begin();
> >> > db.update(client.getUser());
> >> > db.commit();
> >> > }catch (PersistenceException pe){
> >> > rollback(db);
> >> > throw new PersistenceException("Could not delete client.", pe);
> >> > }finally{
> >> > closeDatabase(db);
> >> > }
> >> > }
> >> > ....
> >> >}
> >> >
> >> >The only thing thats 'kinda' tricky is that Client depends on UserInfo
> >> >and some relationships going down as well, but still it works with an
> >> >older checkout of Castor but not the newest. I'll try and see if I can
> >> >come up with a small case tonight thats repeatable.
> >>
> >> That would be absolutely great.
> >>
> >> Werner
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >-----------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> >If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> >> > unsubscribe castor-dev
> >> >
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> >> unsubscribe castor-dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> >If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> > unsubscribe castor-dev
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
