Keith Visco wrote:

Hi Honglin,

Looks like Castor is having trouble determining which choice to use when
it encounters the "t" element. What happens if you put <a_child> or
<b_child> first before the "<t>". I know that's not what you want, but
it might be the only work around at the moment.

Also can you file this bug at http://bugzilla.exolab.org

Thanks,

--Keith


Honglin Ye wrote:

I too have unmarshal problem with choice.

My schema is like this:

        <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";>
        <xs:element name="setup" type="setupType"/>
       <xs:complexType name="setupType">
               <xs:choice>
                       <xs:group ref="aSetupType"/>
                       <xs:group ref="bSetupType"/>
               </xs:choice>
               <xs:attribute name="setup_name" type="xs:string"/>
       </xs:complexType>

       <xs:group name="aSetupType">
               <xs:sequence>
                       <xs:element name="t" type="a_tType"/>
                       <xs:element name="a_child" type="aChildType"/>
               </xs:sequence>
       </xs:group>

        <xs:group name="bSetupType">
               <xs:sequence>
                       <xs:element name="t" type="b_tType"/>
                       <xs:element name="b_child" type="bChildType"/>
               </xs:sequence>
       </xs:group>

castor could not unmarshal the following, which was generated by its own marshal 
framework:
    <setup setup_name="B">
       <t>b_tType content</t>
       <b_child>bChildType content</b_child>
     </setup>

change the order of aSetupType and bSetupType in the choice block, it can unmarshal 
the above,
but it could not marshal

    <setup setup_name="A">
       <t>a_tType content</t>
       <a_child>aChildType content</a_child>
     </setup>

Can anyone tell me how to get arround of this?

Thanks

Honglin

-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
       unsubscribe castor-user




----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-user



Hi, Keith,
   Thank you very much!
   You are right, If I put <t> element at the end, it works fine. I can
live with that with no problem.
   I looked at the source generated, there is no choice logic in the code.
I just keep an eye the development on this item.

Honglin



----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-user

Reply via email to