Keith, Kiran, Sudhendra, and Bryan,

Thanks so much for your replies! Sorry that I somehow missed that in the
doc.

The setLocationPath() function works very well!


Dave




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Visco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: June 11, 2004 5:08
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML] Ignoring XML tags
>
>
>
>
> Just keep in mind that the location attribute is still kind of
> "experimental" and there are a couple open bugs on it.
>
> --Keith
>
>
> Sudhendra Seshachala wrote:
> >
> > IT is not required to have java objects for every element. There is a
> > 'location' attribute that you can associate with the bind-xml rul in the
> > mapping. Poke around the castor website/documentation. It kind of works
> > kewl.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sudhi
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan LaPlante [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 7:36 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [castor-user] [XML] Ignoring XML tags
> >
> > Would this work for you.
> > <!ELEMENT ROOT (CONTAINER*)>
> > <!ELEMENT CONTAINER (SOMEOBJECT)>
> > <!ELEMENT SOMEOBJECT (#CDATA)>
> >
> > Converting this to xsd and then generating your Java classes from that
> > will produce a ROOT element that has a one to many with CONTAINER and a
> > container that has a required OBJECT where the object contains content.
> > Your ROOT class will have an ArrayList probably called CONTAINERList and
> > the appropriate add, enumerate and clear methods.
> >
> > Bryan LaPlante
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Leangen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 12:38 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [castor-user] [XML] Ignoring XML tags
> >
> > Is it NECESSARY to bind a Java object to EVERY XML tag?
> >
> > In particular, if I have some type of XML:
> >
> > <root>
> >   <containerList>
> >     <container>
> >       <object>something useful</object>
> >     <container>
> >        ...
> >   </containerList>
> > </root>
> >
> > And if all I'm interested in is building a java.util.List of the objects
> > above, pretty much ignoring all the other elements, how would I go about
> > doing that without having to create Java objects for <containerList> and
> > <container>?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> >         unsubscribe castor-user
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> >         unsubscribe castor-user
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
>         unsubscribe castor-user



----------------------------------------------------------- 
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
        unsubscribe castor-user

Reply via email to