Hi Keith,
I tried all of those things. If you look at bug 1699 I describe the hack I
made to the castor source to fix the problem. It may not be the right hack, but so far
it is doing the trick.
Thanks
Eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Visco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:09 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [castor-user] Help with upgrade problem
>
>
>
>
> It probably has to do with <restriction base="xsd:integer">
>
> What happens if you change that to "xsd:string"?
>
> --Keith
>
>
> "Hallander, Jon Eric (Eric)** CTR **" wrote:
> >
> > Don't know why my re-send was missing this information, but
> here it is for completeness sake:
> >
> > used to generate code that looked like this:
> >
> > public abstract class LinkConnection_T implements
> java.io.Serializable {
> >
> > .
> >
> > .
> >
> > private
> com.lucent.oms.xml.routingData.types.ChannelProtectionType_T
> _channelProtType;
> >
> > .
> >
> > .
> >
> > public void
> setChannelProtType(com.lucent.oms.xml.routingData.types.Channe
lProtectionType_T channelProtType)
> > {
> > this._channelProtType = channelProtType;
> > } //-- void
> setChannelProtType(com.lucent.oms.xml.routingData.types.Channe
lProtectionType_T)
> >
> >
> >
> > But now generates code that looks like this:
> >
> > public class LinkConnection_T implements java.io.Serializable {
> >
> > .
> >
> > .
> >
> > private int _channelProtType;
> >
> > .
> >
> > .
> >
> > public void setChannelProtType(int channelProtType)
> > {
> > this._channelProtType = channelProtType;
> > this._has_channelProtType = true;
> > } //-- void setChannelProtType(int)
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hallander, Jon Eric (Eric)** CTR **
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 3:43 PM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: [castor-user] Help with upgrade problem
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am resending this mail as the last time I sent it it was
> > > html formatted
> > > and I see that that was the wrong format and maybe that is
> > > why I saw no
> > > responses to it.
> > >
> > > Since the posting of this, I am pretty sure the description
> > > of the problem
> > > identifies a bug, and created
> > > http://bugzilla.exolab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1699 o track this.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Eric
> > >
> > > Original Mail:
> > >
> > > We are trying to upgrade our castor from .9.3.9 to .9.5.3 and
> > > we seem to have run into a little problem which I am having
> > > trouble figuring out an answer to. The generated code for the
> > > set/gets is now using the restriction base type instead of
> > > the simpleType that was being used before. So we would like
> > > to avoid a bunch of code change. There must be somethine that
> > > I haven't found yet that controls this.
> > > Thanks
> > > Eric
> > > For the schema that looks like this:
> > > <xsd:simpleType name="ChannelProtectionType_T">
> > > <xsd:restriction base="xsd:integer">
> > > <xsd:enumeration value = "CPT_NA" />
> > > <xsd:enumeration value = "CPT_S" />
> > > <xsd:enumeration value = "CPT_P" />
> > > <xsd:enumeration value = "CPT_Y" />
> > > <xsd:enumeration value = "CPT_R" />
> > > </xsd:restriction>
> > > </xsd:simpleType>
> > >
> > > which is used in somethine like this:
> > > <xsd:complexType name="LinkConnection_T">
> > > <xsd:sequence>
> > > <xsd:element name="aNEId"
> > > type="ObjectReference_T"/>
> > > <xsd:element name="zNEId"
> > > type="ObjectReference_T"/>
> > > <xsd:element name="channelProtType"
> > > type="ChannelProtectionType_T"/>
> > > <xsd:element
> > > name="channelServerProtType"
> type="ChannelServerProtectionType_T"/>
> > > </xsd:sequence>
> > > <xsd:attributeGroup ref="LinkConnectionAttr"/>
> > > </xsd:complexType>
> > >
> > > used to generate code that looked like this:
> > > public abstract class LinkConnection_T implements
> > > java.io.Serializable {
> > > .
> > >
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> > unsubscribe castor-user
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-user
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-user
