Strictly speaking yes, but I think Emir has been asking for 'automatic'
consistency. If that's not the case, what you are suggesting definitely is an
option.
Werner
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:28:59 -0700, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
>On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:46:37 +0100 (MET), Werner Guttmann
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> for this to work you will have to makes use of a transaction
>> manager/coordinator that supports 2PC (two phase commit), a protocol that
>> guaranteees exectly what you are askig for.
>>
>> In the context of (commercial) web/ejb containers, most major players thee
>> days ship a fully-fledged transaction monitor with their respective
>> products. In the open source world, you could e.g. use Tyrex with e.g.
>> Catalina/Tomcat.
>>
>> Whilst setup is not that difficult, you should have a genral understanding
>> of the involved protocols, APIs (e.g. Sun's JTA), etc.
>
>
>Or he could just set up multiple <database> elements in the jdo-conf
>and use each one in separate transactions to pull data from one data
>source and commit it to the other.
>
>Bruce
>--
>perl -e 'print unpack("u30","<0G)[EMAIL
>PROTECTED]&5R\"F9E<G)E=\$\!F<FEI+F-O;0\`\`");'
>
>The Castor Project
>http://www.castor.org/
>
>Apache Geronimo
>http://geronimo.apache.org/
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-user
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-user
