On 12/27/05, Jean-Paul Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Suggested additions to go along with this one: >
[long list deleted] If "Environment" is the right place for this, we'd likely want something under "Environment" to hold all of the web frameworks. > This is just a preliminary list, of course. If the idea is amenable we can > do a more thorough survey of widely-used environments so that we don't miss > anything. Personally, I don't think there's a need to add every web framework. Any package that can take add-ons should reasonably have a good way to classify those add-ons, so knowing what those classifications should be and how they're set up is a good idea. But, I don't think it's worth adding everything we can think of if there aren't typically add-ons that are distributed and want to register with the Cheeseshop. If it's difficult to add trove classifiers, then maybe it's worth adding them in bulk... but there will always be new things coming along, and as long is the process is understood and not too onerous, it would seem to make sense to add classifiers only when add-ons for a package start showing up. Kevin _______________________________________________ Catalog-sig mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
