[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Stephen Waterbury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> [Jim Fulton wrote:] >>>> Maybe others can chime in. >>> That's also my concern. Nobody else is complaining; AFAICT, there >>> is just one unhappy user of PyPI. >> I'm not happy with PyPI's performance either. >> Probably many users are like me: I thought it was >> common knowledge that the performance of PyPI was bad, but >> I didn't want to complain when it appeared that people were >> working on improvements. > > It has been slow in the past, but Martin has done some great work > speeding it up in the last few days. If it's still slow, please > report when you noticed and what you were trying to do.
I agree, Martin's improvements have made a huge difference, in my recent experience. Thanks, Martin! I inferred from the conversation that the performance is variable, and I think my tests of it have been in off-peak times, so my current impressions should be regarded as anecdotal ... another reason why I hadn't volunteered my opinion until this request for input. Steve _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
