> I'm not happy with PyPI's performance either. > Probably many users are like me: I thought it was > common knowledge that the performance of PyPI was bad
Please trust me that it isn't. I know that PyPI could become unresponsive, and I FIXED that. AFAICT, it's solved, done, can't happen again. I do not know that performance IS bad; I know that it WAS bad (primarily not due to the way the software was written, but due to the way it was run). > but > I didn't want to complain when it appeared that people were > working on improvements. Sure: mere complaints would not be constructive. However, specific *reports* of problems are absolutely necessary. If you experience problems today, tomorrow, next week, by all means, report them. Different people apparently also have different perception what good performance is, so please always make a full bug report: - what precisely did you do (including "when" also in this case), - what happened, - what did you expect to happen instead Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
