On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tarek Ziadé wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>>> >>>> Hmm. Yesterday, there were 199250 accesses to PyPI through wget. >>>> Of those, 169971 requests came from a single address (from Dedibox in >>>> France), 28966 requests from a second one (from Sakura in Japan). >>>> >>>> So it *is* wget mirrors that make the whole traffic in PyPI. >>> >>> If it were me, I'd just IP firewall the offendors. There's not need for >>> this >>> kind of behaviour if there's an acceptable mirror protocol available... >> >> Well not yet... but the PEP should be finished sometimes this week, > > I'm pretty sure that Martin said something was already available...
I am not sure what you are talking about, the only protocol published is pje's documentation on Peak, that explains how a package index should be layered + some insights from Martin in this thread afaik. now, both Andreas and I have worked on the topic, and even if our mirrors have created too much hits on PyPI lately, the "clean" protocol, and the right client behavior that has been described by Martin will be described in the PEP and applied in all clients at some point. And a User-agent request header will be added to identify clients. Cheers Tarek > > Chris > > -- > Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting > - http://www.simplistix.co.uk > -- Tarek Ziadé | Association AfPy | www.afpy.org Blog FR | http://programmation-python.org Blog EN | http://tarekziade.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
