-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 René Dudfield wrote:
> Is it just me, or are these classifiers not as good as tags? > > Should people really have to discuss and get approved what tags they put on > their software? > > Seems like a big waste of everyones time, and doesn't result in as good a > database. Controlled vocabulary fields have different usecases than tags / folksonomy: precise searching is one of them. For licensing, I would say we could update the PEP to say that the 'licence' argument could be used to clarify the classifier (e.g., to spell the version). Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJ6I0u+gerLs4ltQ4RAuqFAJwOBxln1uTDFdWwRBsRxGhBE8cnmwCgvaFd 24V13vQVsEKukdGPw0UBeh4= =cfgi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
