Laura Creighton wrote:
I think it would be better to use the language from the EUPL
see: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=31979
In particular, I think that it is much better to say something like:
In the countries where moral rights apply, the Licensor waives his right to
exercise his
moral right to the extent allowed by law in order to make effective the
licence of the
economic rights here above listed.
The Licensor grants to the Licensee royalty-free, non exclusive usage rights
to any
patents held by the Licensor, to the extent necessary to make use of the
rights granted
on the Work under this Licence.
rather than asserting
The PSF is free to use or disseminate any content ....
This is irrelevant. The EUPL refers to the licensing of the content; the
PSF does not get the right to license (or relicense) content, only to
distribute it. To the extent that anyone is worried about EUPL/GPL-like
obligations on the content that kick in on redistribution, we provide
exactly what was provided to us; if it was compliant on upload, it will
be compliant on download.
Thanks,
Van
_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
