On Jan 12, 2010, at 1:17 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> If we have time at Pycon, and if some folks are interested, I would >>> like to finish the implementation of PEP 381, >> >> Is z3c.pypimirror the "sample implementation" at this point? > > No, it's not - although it's fairly close.
I've been looking at it to possibly use as part of the PyPI meta-data mirroring tool we discussed just before new years. Since mirroring the meta-data would be an efficient first step towards any actual data mirroring, should I use the z3c.pypimirror code and improve that (better granularity, database caching with sqlite instead of .pkl, etc.) or start afresh. Is it being considered as the starting point, or not? S _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
