On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:02 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: [..] > Alternatively, you could start submitting patches.
Some work Matthieu did is already integrated via the branch I worked on for PEP 345. And we were considering using the same workflow since I can commit. Of course, after a while, I wanted to propose Matthieu as a PyPI commiter. >> Maybe it would be easier to switch to the official mercurial repository >> (hg.python.org <http://hg.python.org>), it would allow a better >> collaboration between everybody who would like to contribute. > > I'm not quite sure why that would be. You still couldn't write to the > repository, could you? So what would be the difference? Not answering instead of Matthieu, but with a DVCS he will be able to wrote to the repository, and have the same privileges any other commiters have, as long a offer are great. As a maintainer of the PyPI project, it makes your workflow simpler, - contributors can clone the repo, change the code and ask you for a pull - you can pull changes by direct hg commands, and merge them > > Regards, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > Catalog-SIG@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig > -- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
