On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Michael Crute <mcr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Ian Bicking <i...@colorstudy.com> wrote:
>>> Of course, this means writing code, etc., but I believe this is a reasonable
>>> goal.  I think if "we" (Catalog-SIG?  PyPI maintainers?) committed to using
>>> such an implementation (assuming it was of good quality) that we could find
>>> people (probably not on this list) to write and maintain the code.  People
>>> have already rewritten PyPI a couple times, but no one knows what exactly to
>>> *do* with the rewrite so they haven't gone anywhere.  And PyPI is not a
>>> particularly complicated application.  I think we can set the bar high on
>>> the implementation quality and that people will meet it, so long as they
>>> know their effort won't be in vain.
>>
>> Out of curiosity : have you ever worked with the current implementation ?
>>
>> I have hard time to understand why some people say it's hard to work with it,
>> I don't think its a valid argument.
>
> I briefly played with the current implementation and found it somewhat 
> difficult to work with. Part of the problem is that the code is dated and not 
> well tested. The other part of the problem is that there are too many 
> dependencies and replicating the environment required to run the official 
> code is somewhat painful. For my uses I really don't want to run postgres 
> just to serve a version of the cheeseshop. A project like chishop eliminates 
> many of these problems as it's main dependency is Django which is designed to 
> make setting up the application simple and allows you to chose what kind of 
> database you want from something very simple like sqlite all the way up to 
> something more robust like postgres.

Right, switching to something like SQLAlchemy would be better



-- 
Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org
_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig

Reply via email to