"Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> writes: > > I'm not sure what this means (“on the same URL”). Does the above > > clarification help? > > No. Currently, the RSS is provided at > http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=rss > > Are you proposing that, when accessing this very URL, an Atom > content should be returned?
Ah, I understand. No, it would be inappropriate for that URL to serve an Atom document. > If not: Are you in favor, opposed to, or indifferent to the proposal > of adding the enclosure element to the RSS, along with incrementing > the RSS version number? I'm in favour of the issue reported originally be solved by skipping any changes to the RSS altogether (leave the existing one for a time, of course) and using Atom syndication, since AFAICT it provides all the requirements discussed so far but in addition is properly specified and standardised. -- \ “The cost of a thing is the amount of what I call life which is | `\ required to be exchanged for it, immediately or in the long | _o__) run.” —Henry David Thoreau | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
