> I think most of the response was targeted at the EGG-INFO > meta-data format, not the information itself.
My impression was otherwise: several posters clearly indicated that they don't want exposition of this information (in whatever form), as they expected it would hinder adoption of PEP 345. > If you look at the above mess of upper- and lower-case filenames, > files which only serve as marker and others having actual > content, different content types, etc. I think it's clear > that using this particular format is not a good idea. > > We can do better :-) Unfortunately, it seems, not with the data available. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
