On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Alexis Métaireau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > Sorry for this long silence; I'm now back on track. > > Le 08/28/2010 04:27 AM, P.J. Eby a écrit : >> At 05:08 PM 8/27/2010 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: >>> P.J. Eby wrote: >>> FWIW, I helped add those fields to PEP 345, in the context of making the >>> switch from "module / package"-centric values to distribution-centric >>> ones. The requirements came out of a sprint at PyCon 2009, with input >>> from both the Debian / Ubuntu Python packager (Matthias Klose) and one >>> of the Fedora packagers (Toshio Kuratomi). >> >> Great - could we get them to join in on this discussion to explain what >> it is that they want the creators of Python libraries to put in these >> fields, and what they intend to do with the information once it's there? > +1 on that. We need to have inputs on that: that's good to have fields, > but it's more important to know how they are supposed to be considered. > > Any news about that ? Do someone have email adresses of Matthias Klose > and Toshio Kuratomi ?
Fedora python people are listed here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Python http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ToshioKuratomi should have enough for you to email him. Paul _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
