On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:08 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > That may well be. I'm willing to run another one, and use any ballot > that this list comes up with (as long as the outcome would be accepted > by all).
I asked before: """ How is [Pypi] any different from any other open source project? The majority of Python users don't subscribe to python-dev, yet the core Python team makes decisions on their behalf every day. As maintainers we rely on our ability to "channel" the needs of our community and act according. """ I think you're hearing a clear message from users here, from the people I quoted from Twitter -- I can copy over a dozen more replies if you like -- and from other sources that this feature is ill-considered and shouldn't be part of PyPI. Why are we pretending this is a democracy? You're clearly the BDFL as far as PyPI's concerned, so it's time make a call. Tell me to shut up, and I'll shut up. Or make the change. Just make a call and be done with it. Jacob _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list Catalog-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
