Oops forgot to reply all Le 5 juil. 2011 23:48, "Tarek Ziadé" <[email protected]> a écrit : > They should but some people are still picking a mirror by hand. I think a > good policy could be to remove mirrors which lag > 1 month > > Tarek > Le 5 juil. 2011 20:27, Martin v. Löwis <[email protected]> a écrit : >> Am 05.07.2011 20:12, schrieb Daniel Greenfeld: >>> If it is so far out of date and no one has time to fix it, then maybe >>> it should be taken off the mirror list? >> >> That shouldn't be necessary. Mirror clients should use the last-modified >> time stamp to find out that it is out of date. >> >> Regards, >> Martin >> _______________________________________________ >> Catalog-SIG mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
_______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
