Am 12.07.2011 15:14, schrieb Éric Araujo: > Le 12/07/2011 08:28, Georg Brandl a écrit : >> Am 12.07.2011 08:17, schrieb Sergey Schetinin: >>> On 12 July 2011 09:14, "Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> If you go by trove classifiers, my proposal would be to include all >>>> releases with a classifier "Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable" >>>> or "Development Status :: 6 - Mature". >>> >>> That's very unlikely to work. Once webob got to maturity we set that >>> classifier and it's there even for repo snapshots. I'm sure it's the >>> case for ~100% other projects. >> >> Yeah, the classifier seems to be more appropriate for the project's status, >> not that of individual releases. > > ISTM that the discussion is confusing “stable” and “final”. > > In my understanding, > stable = project status = Trove classifier > final = release status = PEP 386 version
Exactly. While a project itself can be stable (or mature, even), individual releases still can be of pre-release quality. Georg _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
