On 01/02/2012 07:12, Yuval Greenfield wrote:
+1 on removing this security loophole in any of the ways suggested here.
Good grief, it's not a "security loophole".
If you actually cared about security, you'd already be using, recording
and checking the MD5 checksums provided with each download and would
already know that this isn't a security loophole.
If you're not, then quit with the security theater.
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Catalog-SIG mailing list
Catalog-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig