Don't feel offended..I don't care about your module. I am speaking of the general situation.
-aj Stefan Krah wrote: > Andreas Jung <[email protected]> wrote: >> Honestly I am truly pissed of the by arrogance and ignorance of package >> maintainers coming with the very same arguments every time for *not >> hosting* at least copies on PyPI. So my clear message is: if you don't >> care about the professional developers and theirs by not hosting >> packages on PyPI then please stay away... > > While you were busy listing your demands, in the last 24 hours three major > international banks have successfully downloaded the cdecimal package. > > My target audience is well aware of best practices. In fact, I provide > greater security than PyPI by publishing sha256sums on the announce list > when a package is released. > > > What you call "professional development" is just a euphemism for convenience > coupled with a false sense of security. No one can guarantee sanity for each > of the 18000+ packages. > > Downloading is not the bottleneck, briefly auditing and making sure that > a package actually installs is. Python 3 compatibility is another *real* > issue, so perhaps you might want to upgrade your own packages. > > > Stefan Krah > > > _______________________________________________ > Catalog-SIG mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
<<attachment: lists.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
