On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <[email protected]> wrote: > Last time there were discussions around whether to place the version > information in a subsequent field. Despite the discussion about this, > a subsequent license has been added to the catalog where the version is > included in the main string [3]_. > .. [3]: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/2012-January/004186.html
This was done to match the two existing entries: License :: OSI Approved :: Mozilla Public License 1.0 (MPL) License :: OSI Approved :: Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL 1.1) So the following was added in the end: License :: OSI Approved :: Mozilla Public License 2.0 (MPL 2.0) I think an additional sub-namespace for GPL licenses doesn't really add anything, so I'd be +1 on the proposal. Hanno _______________________________________________ Catalog-SIG mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/catalog-sig
