The Thing-athon is a hackathon for metadata created using RDA: Resource
Description and Access and the RDA editor RIMMF, where catalogers,
developers, and vendors get together to explore RDA and its application
beyond the MARC environment. The Thing-athon is based on the Jane-athons
<http://rballs.info/topics/p/jane/janeathon.html>  that focus on Jane Austen
and her works; these have been a great success and a lot of fun. So make
sure to include our event in your conference plans.

The Thing-athon is as a ticketed event
<http://2016.alamidwinter.org/ticketedevents>  at ALA Midwinter 2016 in
Boston and will take place on Thursday, January 7, 2016, at the Lamont
Library on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge. It will be a
day-long event, running from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm. A pizza lunch will be
provided.

Register  <http://2016.alamidwinter.org/register-now>  for the Thing-athon
-- learn more <http://www.rdatoolkit.org/blog/7775> 

If you are attending or thinking of attending this event, you can register
for the pre-event live online RIMMF training session
<https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/2079250526215448578>  scheduled
for December 15, 2015 from 1:00-3:00 PM (EST):
<https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/2079250526215448578>  

Special Topics

Each of the following topics will be the focus of one or more collaborative
teams/tables during the RIMMFing session on the day. Each team will contain
4-6 members and have an expert leader, and/or access to a roving expert
coach. RIMMF may be used to illustrate the issues discussed. Teams and
individuals may focus on specific examples within the topics.

New to RDA and RIMMF?

Explore the basic features of pure RDA using RIMMF, the RDA data editor, by
working in groups or individually on one of the following scenarios commonly
encountered in academic and research libraries.

Digitization. A focus on how RDA relates metadata for digitized resources to
the metadata for original resources, and how RIMMF can be used to improve
the quality of MARC 21 records during digitization projects.

Digitizing a printed resource creates at least one new Manifestation of the
same Expression; in fact, each online format is a separate Manifestation
requiring different software and hardware.

.        Find a digitized resource online and use RIMMF to find and import a
MARC record for the original resource.

.        Make the FRBRized data compliant with RDA using the online source
of information.

.        Clone the data for the original resource for each digitized
manifestation, adjust as necessary, and link the resources.

.        Export the RDA/RIMMF data for each manifestation as  MARC records,
and compare the results with the imported MARC record.

 

Undergraduate editions. A focus on issues of multiple editions that have
little or no change in content, vs. significant changes in content, and how
RDA accommodates the different scenarios.

FRBR and RDA are based on a separation of content data from carrier data. If
the content changes, a new Expression is required; if the carrier changes, a
new Manifestation is required. Undergraduate textbooks, covering
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science,_Technology,_Engineering,_and_Mathema
ticshttps:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science,_Technology,_Engineering,_and_Mathe
matics>  STEM subjects for instance, are often published with new editions
statements; when this happens, the carrier identification data for a
textbook will have changed, but that does not necessarily mean that the
content of the new publication has actually changed.

.        Use RIMMF to find and import MARC records or create native RDA data
for examples of different publications of the same undergraduate work

.        Provide the identifying data for the different publications

.        If content in the new publication has changed, provide new content
data as new Expression data

.        Create relationship links between the data for the various editions

 

Interested in RDA and linked data for academic, research, and special
collections?

Contribute to the development of RDA in group discussion on topics faced by
institutional repositories and other types of special collection, using
RIMMF and real RDA data to illustrate the issues and explore ways to resolve
them.

 

Strings vs things. A focus on replacing strings in metadata with URIs for
things. Higher education and research library data tend to store
human-readable labels rather than machine-readable identifiers. If the
labels for names and titles do not use linked authority control, relating
the underlying things must rely on matching strings, whether they are
transcribed or recorded as access points.

The RSC is developing RDA's "four-fold path" for relationship data in light
of RDF linked data and the forthcoming consolidated FRBR model.

.        Discuss the differences between structured and unstructured data,
transcribed and recorded data, and linked data, and their impact on
cataloging and retrieval services.

 

Institutional repositories, archives and scholarly communication. A focus on
issues in relating and linking data in institutional repositories and
archives with library catalogs. Institutional repositories and archives hold
a wide range of resources associated with teaching and research. Many of the
repository resources are often intrinsically related, such as conference
presentations, pre-prints, and final published papers, as is recognized in
the Scholarly Works Application Profile
<http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/repositories/digirep/index/Scholarly_Works_Applicati
on_Profile> , based on the same FRBR model as RDA. The resource creators
also have complex relationships with each other and with academic
departments, institutions, and research groups.

The RSC wishes to develop RDA to meet the needs of institutional
repositories and archives.

.        Discuss the element and vocabulary refinements and extensions for
RDA that will support the use of application profiles for academic
communication, including relationship designators for agents involved in the
process of research collaboration and publication, and categorization of
scholarly resources.

 

Rare materials and RDA. A continuing discussion on the development of RDA
and DCRM2 begun at the JSC meeting and the international seminar on RDA and
rare materials
<https://catandindexgroup.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/rda-rare-materials-semina
r-edinburgh-6th-november-2/>  held in November 2015.

The RSC has prioritized the development of RDA to meet the needs of special
collection, archive, and museum communities for rare and unpublished
resources.

.        Contribute to the discussions ongoing from the recent JSC meeting
and the subsequent RLS-athon <http://rballs.info/topics/p/rls/rlsathon1/>
on RDA's treatment of rare materials, including accommodation and guidance
for transcription data, differentiation of Item and Manifestation, etc.

 

 

James Hennelly

Managing Editor

ALA Digital Reference

1-800-545-2433, ext 5051, or 312-280-5051

[email protected]

 

Reply via email to