On 7/3/06, Matt S Trout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought I said "this probably works but it should be documented and tested". > Generally that means "it's unsupported unless you write said docs and tests" > :)
At the time it really meant: "Code it already and you can finally be free to go home for today". ;-) > One "OMG the app doesn't work" error is enough to block a DBIC release - hence > why we tend to take a few dev releases before we bother marking one RC > quality. > > This is a complete pain in the ass and I take no pleasure whatsoever in the > amount of fucking about that results for the maints. But this thing talks to > you guys' production databases and quite a few of our clients' as well, so > it's not like we have an alternative. I'm really glad you've got this sort of commitment to DBIC users. I think this makes everyone feel like they can really depend on DBIC (and Catalyst). I hope both projects stay this way. -Nilson Santos F. Jr. _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
