Jonathan Rockway wrote: > More of my 2 cents :) > >> Rails is easy because, it would appear, it >> sacrifices TMTOWTDI - they lost me right there. >> > > Yup. And from a technical standpoint, rails isn't all that good. > ActiveRecord? Great for blogs and Basecamp, bad for everything else. > Even my boss picked up on this immediately! (And thinks Catalyst is > similarly afflicted -- I guess I'll have to write a demo app to prove > them wrong :)
Point out that everybody on http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/wiki/LiveApplications disagrees :) > I do admit that saying "ActiveRecord" feels really good. Much better > than DBIx::Class::Schema ;) I find saying "supports composite primary keys and foreign key constraints" feels even better. But maybe that's just me ... _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
