Rodney Broom wrote: > From: "Matt S Trout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Rodney Broom wrote: >>>> The reason for -u diffs... >>> Aha, -u. New patches atached. >> Right, since we ended up about 15 messages deep in a thread, can you re-post >> this as a "diff -urP" to a fresh thread so we can discuss it properly? > > The last message (from me) in the original thread has a patch and > instructions per the 'NOTES FOR PATCH SENDERS' section of the patch(1) manual > page. That thread was: > > 'Subject: Re: [Catalyst] SOLUTION: Re:Authentication::Store::DBICworksunder' > . 'myapp_server.pl ' > > Is that posting in line with what we're thinking for submitting patches?
I only saw one that was three separate patches ... As I say, we're too deep in this thread and it's wandered way off-topic. Start a new one so we can see what we're doing :) _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
