Hugh Lampert wrote:
> Experts: Why is Catalyst a qw/better more-robust more-enduring
> better-Rails-Killer easier-to-use/ framework than Jifty or
> (Woodstock|Mojo)?
>
> Seeing these other frameworks mentioned online - just curious.
Catalyst is designed to be flexible, extensible and basically let you do
things whatever way your app needs. It's not designed to be a Rails killer.
Rails is a toy. We go where Rails apps fear to tread (like, say, multi-column
primary keys, full-stack utf8 support and integrating with SVN, LDAP and all
manner of other models).
Jifty is substantially focused on new database-backed web applications and
provides One True Way to do everything (and nice integration of said true
ways) and Rails-like declarative syntax.
Mojo is vapourware, and I fully expect it to be released shortly after Duke
Nukem Forever for Vista ships.
--
Matt S Trout Offering custom development, consultancy and support
Technical Director contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd. mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information
+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
