Matt S Trout wrote: > Axkit2 looks like it'll be a lovely candidate for a production-quality > scalable standalone server, although it's a single-process affair with > optional forking so we'll need to figure out how to manage that appropriately > to maximise performance. > > I've been having some fairly sick thoughts about preforked Catalyst handlers > and $dbh pools (with some assistance from a Storage subclass) but we'll get > to > that later :)
Won't that be just like Lighttpd and FastCGI? That's the trouble with any asynchronous I/O approach: you have to do some kind of FastCGI/mod_perl backend server to run all the real code in because the async server can't talk to any databases. - Perrin _______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
