Why don't I _ever_ hear about Mason on this list? How is TT better than
Mason anyway?
...not meaning to start a flame war...
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 11:41 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess: s/Google and Yahoo use ClearSilver and not TT./Google uses
ClearSilver and Yahoo is no where near #1 in search (php)./
The only thing I see mention of Google using it for is "Google Groups",
their Usenet thing. Yahoo gets massive amounts of traffic. They get
orders of magnitude more hits than a typical popular website.
All I'm saying is that the speed of the current crop of templating tools
for Perl is unlikely to be the thing holding you back from building a
scalable site. TT is plenty fast enough, if you don't try to wedge a
bunch of controller logic into it. But if you prefer the syntax of
ClearSilver, then go ahead and use it.
- Perrin
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
************************
MLB.com: Where Baseball is Always On
_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
