Adam Sjøgren wrote:
On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:05:51 +0000 (GMT), Jon wrote:

If considering Mason as a templating language for Catalyst, it's
worth looking at Text::MicroMason (and Catalyst::View::MicroMason). _Almost_ the same syntax as HTML::Mason but fewer prerequisites (in
particular not requiring mod_perl)

How does HTML::Mason require mod_perl?

It may now be fixed, but the way it worked out its dependencies had a tendency to result in it deciding to ask for mod_perl for no good reason if certain other things were missing.

I found this because I got bored once and decided to help the Jifty guys fix their installibility problems since their users seemed to be having worse trouble than Catalyst users used to and I was curious if it was something simple; I think they went and chased up the Mason guys about it.

Either way though, that was only a Makefile.PL bug - even with the buggy version if you installed all the actual deps by hand Mason tested happily with no mod_perl.

--
     Matt S Trout       Offering custom development, consultancy and support
  Technical Director    contracts for Catalyst, DBIx::Class and BAST. Contact
Shadowcat Systems Ltd.  mst (at) shadowcatsystems.co.uk for more information

+ Help us build a better perl ORM: http://dbix-class.shadowcatsystems.co.uk/ +

_______________________________________________
List: [email protected]
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/

Reply via email to