I really don't want to start a bashing session, but I have some
concerns that those much more knowledgeable than me should hopefully
be able to clarify.
Recently, I saw this article via Catalyst Planet: http://
letsgetdugg.com/feed/view/Catalyst_vs_Rails_vs_Django_Cook_off
Essentially, according to his test, which doesn't take into account
ORM performance, Rails & Django knock the socks of Catalyst.
In victori's remarks, he calls for a change in Catalyst and points to
the other advantages to to this framework, mostly related to ease of
coding. While the whole reason I came to Catalyst is because I'm
comfortable with Perl and don't want to learn Ruby, I'm worried that
my Catalyst application won't perform as well when/if my app usage
becomes very significant. Should I be concerned?
Again, I'm not interesting in hearing about how Rails/Ruby/Django/
Python sucks, but in facts about real performance of Catalyst.
Many thanks,
Conan.
_______________________________________________
List: Catalyst@lists.rawmode.org
Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst
Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.rawmode.org/
Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
