Christopher H. Laco wrote: > Paul Makepeace wrote: >> On 11/16/06, Christopher H. Laco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Regardless of whether the test is 'real world', and regardless of >>> whether the frameworks 'were meant to serve more complicated things', >>> Catalyst is slower in this instance. All things being unequal, if I tell >>> my boss we have 3 frameworks to choose from, and one is flexible, and >>> the others are fast, he's going to choose fast every time...even knowing >>> the testing may be faulty. Yes, I know better. He probably does too. But >>> that's how the world works. >> What world is this? The world that doesn't realise programmers are far >> more expensive than hardware? The world where bosses don't realise the >> cost of inflexibility? The ability not to adapt fast is a concern >> that's been hammered long and hard in business circles since forever >> so this nominal boss would have to be really particularly shortsighted >> to blindly choose speed over flexibility. >> >> Post a rebuttal, suggest better benchmarks, leave a trackback, move >> on. This doesn't seem like getting wound up about. >> >> Paul > > It's a world where PHBs often look at web stats and ask "What the hell > is this slow" a lot more than they ask "Why isn't the system flexible". > > > -=Chris
And a world where customers don't bitch that your framework is inflexibly, but will bitch if it's slow.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ List: [email protected] Listinfo: http://lists.rawmode.org/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
